🚚 complimentary SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.6/5 from 926+ reviews
Fashion✓ In Stock🔥 Bestseller

Crock-Pot® retro Slow Cooker, qt Smith's Food and Drug

★★★★★4.6 out of 5(926 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$3237​
$5395
Sale
✓ no-cost fulfillment on this item • Limited time offer

Crock-Pot® vintage Slow Cooker, qt Smith's Food and Drug

🔒
Secure Checkout
🚚
prompt shipment

↩️
hassle-no-cost Returns

📋 Product Description

Crock-Pot® iconic Slow Cooker, qt Smith's Food and Drug

Crock-Pot® traditional Slow Cooker, qt Smith's Food and Drug

This product is flawless for anyone looking for quality Fashion products.

📐 Specifications

SKU: 2279004

Category: Fashion > Products >

Original Price:$5395 USD

Sale Price:$3237 USD​

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand latest

🚚 shipment & Returns

✓ on the house fulfillment on orders over $50

Standard transport: 3-5 business days

Express shipping: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

Recommended For You

4.6
★★★★★
Based on 8176 reviews
SW
Shirley Williams ✓ Verified Purchase
9 months ago · Kansas City, MO
★★★★★
remarkable purchase
This exceeded my expectations. The color and design match the photos perfectly. really impressed overall.
31 people found this helpful
AK
Anna King
10 months ago · Milwaukee, WI
★★★★★
Fantastic product
Impressed from the start. It arrived quickly and was packaged exceptionally carefully. A solid purchase.
45 people found this helpful
ED
Edward Davis ✓ Verified Purchase
5 months ago · San Francisco, CA
★★★★☆
Absolutely outstanding
outstanding product overall. I've been using it daily and it holds up fabulous. Very happy customer!
27 people found this helpful
DM
Donna Morris ✓ Verified Purchase
2 months ago · St. Louis, MO
★★★★☆
faultless purchase
magnificent choice! It works flawlessly every time I use it. Will buy again!
30 people found this helpful
BE
Benjamin Evans ✓ Verified Purchase
9 months ago · Indianapolis, IN
★★★★★
truly impressed
Really happy I got this. It solved exactly the problem I had. Simply the supreme!
2 people found this helpful