🚚 complimentary SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.6/5 from 163+ reviews
Womenβœ“ In StockπŸ”₯ Bestseller

XAGA - Shorts

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…4.6 out of 5(163 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$165
$275
Sale
βœ“ gratis distribution on this item β€’ Limited time offer

Rise : NormalFastening : Concealed flyPockets : Back pocket, side pocketsPattern : CheckedArticle number : IR221S00Y-A11

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
quick Shipping
↩️
hassle-at no charge Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

XAGA - Shorts

Rise : Normal
Fastening : Concealed fly
Pockets : Back pocket, side pockets
Pattern : Checked
Article number : IR221S00Y-A11

This product is magnificent for anyone looking for quality Women products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 1578231

Category: Women > Clothing > Shorts

Original Price:$275 USD

Sale Price:$165 USD​

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand recent

🚚 shipment & Returns

βœ“ at no charge distribution on orders over $50

Standard transport: 3-5 business days​

Express shipment: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.6
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 5917 reviews
ET
Emily Thompson
8 months ago Β· Chicago, IL
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Absolutely remarkable
The XAGA - Shorts feels pleasant in use.
34 people found this helpful
CL
Christopher Lee βœ“ Verified Purchase
5 months ago Β· Virginia Beach, VA

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
truly impressed
the XAGA - Shorts feels solid and it works for me.
31 people found this helpful
RM
Robert Martinez βœ“ Verified Purchase
10 months ago Β· Memphis, TN
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Absolutely adore it
Fair quality XAGA - Shorts considering the price.
30 people found this helpful
LJ
Lisa Johnson
5 months ago Β· Boston, MA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
outstanding in every way
From my experience, the XAGA - Shorts performs as expected and it works for me. No setup issues.
11 people found this helpful
TT
Thomas Taylor βœ“ Verified Purchase
6 months ago Β· Phoenix, AZ
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
magnificent XAGA - Shorts
Honestly, the XAGA - Shorts fits my needs so it’s acceptable.
36 people found this helpful