🚚 complimentary SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.9/5 from 515+ reviews
Vintageβœ“ In StockπŸ”₯ Bestseller 

Vintage ink well/paperweight

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…4.9 out of 5(515 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$11
$18.33
Sale
βœ“ gratis distribution on this item β€’ Limited time offer

Vintage ink well with lid. 2 inch square.

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
rapid shipment
↩️
uncomplicated Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Vintage ink well/paperweight

Vintage ink well with lid. 2 inch square.

This product is outstanding for anyone looking for quality Vintage products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 988268

Category: Vintage > Antiques > 50 to 75 Years

Original Price:$18.33 USD

Sale Price:$11 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand recent

🚚 dispatch & Returns

βœ“ gratis delivery on orders over $50

Standard shipment: 3-5 business days

Express fulfillment: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.9
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 4751 reviews
LJ
Lisa Johnson βœ“ Verified Purchase
4 months ago Β· San Diego, CA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
remarkably pleased
Personally, the Vintage ink well/paperweight feels solid and it’s fine overall. Arrived on time.
24 people found this helpful
AD
Amanda Davis βœ“ Verified Purchase
11 months ago Β· Miami, FL​
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
superior
Nice value product Vintage ink well/paperweight.
2 people found this helpful
RH
Ryan Hill βœ“ Verified Purchase
5 months ago Β· Houston, TX
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
outstanding for my needs
At first, the Vintage ink well/paperweight feels solid and it works for me. Arrived on time.
49 people found this helpful
KG
Kevin Green βœ“ Verified Purchase
4 months ago Β· Cleveland, OH
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Outstanding quality
In daily use, the Vintage ink well/paperweight works fine which is good enough.
46 people found this helpful
CE
Christina Evans βœ“ Verified Purchase
3 weeks ago Β· St. Louis, MO
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Highly satisfied
After a few days, the Vintage ink well/paperweight feels okay and I don’t regret it.
43 people found this helpful